[SML] house light control systems recommendations needed
B. H. Ackler
backler at ix.netcom.com
Sat Dec 6 21:08:09 UTC 2014
Agree with Bill, pulling the Switch should be for true Emergencies.
Under a "Break Glass" cover is simple and uses existing equipment only
with name and color changes.
Shouldn't we also be discussing adequate aisle lighting as a part of this
discussion, especially in this day and age of LED strips and glowing sidewalks
and roads.
What would be fabulous would be a internal digital camera which would
take a picture of the moment of activation, who and what.
Course a 30 second video clip would be even more informative.
Bryan H. Ackler
Portland, Oregon
------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 17:53:58 -0800 (PST)
> From: billn at peak.org
> Subject: Re: [SML] house light control systems recommendations needed
>
> > All the same, I still believe that the HM, being responsible for
> > audience safety, should have an override ON for the house lights. I
> > appreciate that not all the HMs that you encounter may not be capable
> > of exercising that authority with discretion. That's life.
>
> I would agree under ONE condition. That override control was behind a "break
> glass to activate cover" and that the override also activated the evacuation
> alarm.
>
> Bill
>
> Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 20:03:25 -0800
> From: Richard Niederberg <ladesigners at gmail.com>
>
> Dear Bill,
>
> That sounds like a trade-off worth considering.
>
> /s/ Richard
More information about the Stagecraft
mailing list