[SML] Super Titles

Stephen Rees Stephen.Rees at fredonia.edu
Fri Aug 7 11:12:24 UTC 2015


Bruce,
It depends on your throw distance. You can't fight physics. In our
circumstance, the unit was 5500w at 90 feet. Even if you can mount it close
enough to your screen and get a wide enough image, it would still be
marginal.  YMMV.
 SteveRees

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Bruce Purdy via Stagecraft <
stagecraft at theatrical.net> wrote:

> Stephen Litterst  wrote:
> >
> > Bruce's clients don't usually have deep pockets (to be brutally honest,
> sorry Bruce)
>
>         No apology needed - that’s a completely accurate assessment.
>
> > so we were brainstorming solutions that would fit in their budget and
> resources.  Such solution tend to be grossly inefficient. However,
> efficiency is not always the goal.  Effectiveness is.
>
>         Exactly!
>
>         I will be Summarising the ideas / options mentioned here - ranging
> from Cell Phones to LEDs, then come back to PowerPoint projection.I have NO
> doubt that video projection is the way she’ll agree to go, if in fact we do
> move forward on this project.
>
>         By the by, I mentioned the huge cinema projector, since it’s
> already installed. I realise that it is overkill and may not be the best
> option. At the other extreme, would a small (~1,100 Watt) boardroom type
> projector be worth bothering with?
>
> Bruce
> -----
> Bruce Purdy
> Central New York Magic Theatre Co.
> http://cnymagic.com
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
> Stagecraft mailing list
> Stagecraft at theatrical.net
> http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20150807/70a74a74/attachment.html>


More information about the Stagecraft mailing list