[SML] FCC rules on wifi jamming.

[Chip Wood]

As long as they never mention "wi-fi" or "blocking" on any construction 
document.  Every little cafe, coffee,  and pizza joint has big ads 
offering free wi-fi, but every business class or higher hotel makes you 
pay a ridiculous amount for it.    Yet they call themselves full 
service.  Weird?

But this only applies to active RF jamming or "deauthorization?" of 
personal Wi-Fi hot spots operating on mobile networks right, not 
construction blocking or Wi-Fi jamming.

Chip 1

On 1/28/2015 1:41 PM, Richard Niederberg via Stagecraft wrote:
> Dear Dale,
> If they built their Hotels like Faraday cages, to strengthen the 
> building from all EMR [Think a real-life version of the fictional 007 
> 'GoldenEye'], they wouldn't have a problem with the FCC.
> /s/ Richard
>
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Dale Farmer via Stagecraft 
> <stagecraft at theatrical.net <mailto:stagecraft at theatrical.net>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     The FCC released it's ruling on the marriott wifi blocking
>     matter.    WHat they did was essentially jamming, and anyone else
>     who tries to do this will get "...substantial monetary penalties."
>
>     http://gizmodo.com/the-fcc-fined-marriott-for-600-000-for-blocking-guests-1642154851/1682126231
>
>     http://www.fcc.gov/document/warning-wi-fi-blocking-prohibited
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20150128/29936459/attachment.html>