[SML] black masking shrunk during cleaning. . . .

[Riter, Andrew]

Border originally 37’9 x 9’10 h is now 37’ 4 x 9’ 4”  (5” of width, and 6” of height)  (they were too tall anyways)

Traveller panels: 26’ 3 x 26’ 3” is now 25’ 11 x 25’ 6 h  (4” of width, 9” of height)

Legs: 8’ x 23’ are now 8’ x 22’ 0 to 22’ 8”  (width didn’t seem to shrink).

Again, I expected shrinkage.  I just expected it all to be similar (they’d all be within a few inches of each other, to allow greater chance of pairing up same heights).  8” swing in finished products was a bit of a shocker.

Andrew M. Riter
Assistant Technical Director / Head Lighting Technician

604-822-2372
Andrew.riter at ubc.ca<mailto:Andrew.riter at ubc.ca>

From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft-bounces at theatrical.net] On Behalf Of Paul Sanow via Stagecraft
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 2:30 PM
To: Stagecraft Mailing List
Cc: Paul Sanow
Subject: Re: [SML] black masking shrunk during cleaning. . . .

Do you find they shrink in both directions?  I assume both ways (in the direction of nap and across "widthwise") but curious about the experience.  Seems like another reason to consider spending more on IFR to start.

Paul Sanow ASTC
Bill Conner Associates LLC
paul at bcaworld.com<mailto:paul at bcaworld.com>

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Barney Simon via Stagecraft <stagecraft at theatrical.net<mailto:stagecraft at theatrical.net>> wrote:
I always tell people to expect 10%, and be happy if it shrinks less.

Barney Simon
JC Hansen Co
Drapes, Drops and Dance Floors

From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft-bounces at theatrical.net<mailto:stagecraft-bounces at theatrical.net>] On Behalf Of Riter, Andrew via Stagecraft
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 7:54 PM
To: 'Stagecraft Mailing List' <stagecraft at theatrical.net<mailto:stagecraft at theatrical.net>>
Cc: Riter, Andrew <andrew.riter at ubc.ca<mailto:andrew.riter at ubc.ca>>
Subject: [SML] black masking shrunk during cleaning. . . .

I knew they would, and I knew it would be unpredictable, but I didn’t expect the amount, or difference in amount of shrinkage. . .

OK, so 18 yr old velour blacks.  First treating and cleaning since fabrication.

The 26’ tall traveller panels lost 9”  (26’3 now 25’6)

But 3 of the 4 panels shrunk the same amount, and can work.  However, the 4th is an inch shorter than the others.  That’s not bad.   We can live with that.


However, across the 11 legs (original height 23’0”), the finished lengths are 8” apart.  Most are clustered at 22’5 or 22’6.  But we have one at 22’8, one at 22’7  (that’s a close pair), and 3 at 22’3, 22’2, and 22’0.  So the legs lost anywhere from 4” to 12”, an 8” difference between the legs.

And 1 leg looked really funny when rigged.  We thought that maybe 1 edge was longer than the other.  Nope,  the middle of the drape was shorter than the edges.  Don’t know if that was original or not, but we certainly noticed it now.

Andrew M. Riter
Assistant Technical Director / Head Lighting Technician

Chan Centre for the Performing Arts
6265 Crescent Road
Vancouver, BC
V6T 1Z1

604-822-2372<tel:604-822-2372>
Andrew.riter at ubc.ca<mailto:Andrew.riter at ubc.ca>


____________________________________________________________
For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
Stagecraft mailing list
Stagecraft at theatrical.net<mailto:Stagecraft at theatrical.net>
http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20150724/06f756a7/attachment.html>