[SML] What is your favorite cue number method?

[Dan Sheehan]

We have evolved to using numbers for lights and letters for sound.

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 3:12 PM, Judy Martel via Stagecraft <
stagecraft at theatrical.net> wrote:

> I second that!
>
> Especially if the sound cues have similar numbers and the same operator is
> running both (as in my theater).
>
> I don’t necessarily say the numbers when I call the cue, but a stand-by
> like this is unwieldy and hard to parse.
>
>     Stand by Lights 37.3  through 38.2 and sound 37.1 through 38.9
>
> Judy
>
>
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 4:10 PM, Kristi R-C via Stagecraft <
> stagecraft at theatrical.net> wrote:
>
> Remember, SMs need to call the cue numbers.
>
> "One thirty-seven point eleven" isn't the easiest thing to call nor for
> the op to parse.
>
> Keep it simple and clear.
>
> Kristi R-C
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
> Stagecraft mailing list
> Stagecraft at theatrical.net
> http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net
>



-- 
...Dan Sheehan
Fixer of things that break
TD Walpole (MA) Footlighters
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20180301/5e42af80/attachment.html>