[SML] more exposed tech

[Joe]

Personally, when it looks that bad, I would assume it was a deliberate aesthetic choice.  In fact, I would not have been surprised if I was told that they spent $100,000 to pay the original artist who came up with the idea, and to implement the design on a pristine looking theater.  That is the way art seems to work sometimes.  If only I could figure out how to convince people to pay me that kind of money.

-Joe
 

    On Monday, January 4, 2021, 9:00:24 AM EST, Stephen Litterst via Stagecraft <stagecraft at theatrical.net> wrote:  
 
 Seems to be the prevailing aesthetic in the Mid-Atlantic restorations.  The Met in Philly is similar.  From an audience standpoint it feels like they’re doing the bare minimum to get a venue up and active again.  It doesn’t come across as an artistic choice.

Steve
—

Stephen Litterst
ETCP - Certified Entertainment Electrician
slitterst at gmail.com

  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20210105/58741c29/attachment.html>