[SML] more exposed tech
Joe
jdunfee12 at yahoo.com
Tue Jan 5 00:43:04 UTC 2021
Personally, when it looks that bad, I would assume it was a deliberate aesthetic choice. In fact, I would not have been surprised if I was told that they spent $100,000 to pay the original artist who came up with the idea, and to implement the design on a pristine looking theater. That is the way art seems to work sometimes. If only I could figure out how to convince people to pay me that kind of money.
-Joe
On Monday, January 4, 2021, 9:00:24 AM EST, Stephen Litterst via Stagecraft <stagecraft at theatrical.net> wrote:
Seems to be the prevailing aesthetic in the Mid-Atlantic restorations. The Met in Philly is similar. From an audience standpoint it feels like they’re doing the bare minimum to get a venue up and active again. It doesn’t come across as an artistic choice.
Steve
—
Stephen Litterst
ETCP - Certified Entertainment Electrician
slitterst at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20210105/58741c29/attachment.html>
More information about the Stagecraft
mailing list