[SML] Venue/Landlord pay millions for Circus Rigging error
Steven Santos
steven at simplycircus.com
Fri Jan 8 23:37:32 UTC 2021
A big part of this is the contract terms. According to some media
reports, the PCC's contract made them responsible for ALL rigging.
Definitions matter when it comes to the law. Defining who is
responsible for what really matters.
If it were to have been properly defined in the contract, the outcome would
likely have been far different.
Now, if it were properly defined, and then local crew got in the middle of
it, you would have a whole other set of issues.
Rigging: The Venue is responsible for all attachments made directly to the
buildings structure. This includes the attachment of the clients chain
hoist(s) to the building structure and operation of the chain hoists. The
tour shall utilize the Venue's riggers for the assembly and raising of all
truss structures before the show. The tour is responsible for all human
rigging (acrobatic rigging, aerial rigging, performer flying and similar
rigging) from the truss down.
That kind of language would have been a game changer.
Unless every venue is going to have an aerial rigger in every time they
have a circus type show in.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 8:50 PM Kristi R-C via Stagecraft <
stagecraft at theatrical.net> wrote:
> One of the reason Workmans' Comp insurance exists is it protects the
> employer from being sued, then losing and going out of business which
> results in the loss of additional jobs. The WC claim will take care of the
> health care and partial income needs to "make the worker whole." and having
> that as a fairly automatic thing benefits both worker - since the bills
> are covered fairly quickly - and the employer who gets to stay in
> business.
>
> Assuming Feld has WC insurance on their employees - and they more than
> likely do as it's a requirement in most states - they can't be directly
> sued by the workers for their injuries received on the job.
>
> Now... the worker's families could sue for "loss of consortium" or any of
> a number of similar claims. The venue is going after Feld.
>
> The lesson for all of us is - if you see something that doesn't look
> right, say something and don't let anything go in the air you're not
> willing to be held liable for.
>
> If you are the hosting venue/organization, ensure you do your due
> diligence when to comes to safety - even when it's a "circus act that takes
> care of them selves" as we are often told.
>
> And if you're not certain, we've got lots of folks who know both Circus
> and ETCP rigging now - ASK!
>
> Kristi R-C
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Conner via Stagecraft <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> To: Stagecraft Mailing List <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Cc: Bill Conner <billconnerastc at gmail.com>
> Sent: Sun, Dec 27, 2020 12:08 pm
> Subject: Re: [SML] Venue/Landlord pay millions for Circus Rigging error
>
> Interesting that the lawyers for this case were also leads on station
> fire. By their website, their two largest settlements, by significant
> amounts.
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2020, 12:56 PM Bill Conner <billconnerastc at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Interesting but not surprising. Very likely the civic center and its
> management had much deeper pockets - more insurance - than Feld. Seems
> like this may lead to more confrontations between venues and tours, since
> it seems to hold the venue responsible for the tour's work. That assumes
> tours will resume someday.
>
> Lou, thanks for posting this.
>
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2020, 7:36 PM Lou Poppler via Stagecraft <
> stagecraft at theatrical.net> wrote:
>
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/21/us/circus-acrobats-injured-settlement.html
>
> In Rhode Island in 2014, at a Feld "Ringling Bros" show, eight acrobats
> fell
> after a rigging failure. (IIRC the entire rigged assembly supporting the
> acrobats was suspended from a single carabiner which was cocked slightly
> so that the load was not oriented along the long axis.)
>
> Later that year, OSHA issued a $7,000 fine — “the maximum fine allowed by
> law”
> — to Feld Entertainment. Last Monday, lawyers for the acrobats settled
> a lawsuit with the owner and operator of the arena where the performance
> took
> place, for $52.5 million (Rhode Island Convention Center, and SMG).
>
> The acrobats' lawyer said: "There are safety standards and safety features
> that were supposed to be in place for every event, no matter whether it’s
> the circus, or whether you’re dealing with, you know, college basketball,”
> Mr. Mandell said. “Those were not used, they were not utilized for this
> performance, and so that is where our claims against the arena derived
> from.”
>
> My interest in all this, as a retired local crew high rigger (or sometimes
> lead local rigger) is to suggest that we might need to be more assertive
> about complaining, when we see the touring riggers or show management
> rigging something in a questionable manner.
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
> Stagecraft mailing list
> Stagecraft at theatrical.net
> http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
> Stagecraft mailing list
> Stagecraft at theatrical.net
> http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net
> ____________________________________________________________
> For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
> Stagecraft mailing list
> Stagecraft at theatrical.net
> http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20210108/7a663644/attachment.html>
More information about the Stagecraft
mailing list