<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">One of the problems I see with this is you’d be blocking the cell reception of guests trying to use their phones for regular calls. Guests aren’t going to stay
in a hotel where they can’t get phone calls especially if it’s for business.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"> Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft-bounces@theatrical.net]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Chip Wood via Stagecraft<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, January 28, 2015 4:36 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Stagecraft Mailing List<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [SML] FCC rules on wifi jamming.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">As long as they never mention "wi-fi" or "blocking" on any construction document. Every little cafe, coffee, and pizza joint has big ads offering free wi-fi, but every business class or higher hotel makes you pay a ridiculous amount for
it. Yet they call themselves full service. Weird? <br>
<br>
But this only applies to active RF jamming or "deauthorization?" of personal Wi-Fi hot spots operating on mobile networks right, not construction blocking or Wi-Fi jamming.<br>
<br>
Chip 1<br>
<br>
On 1/28/2015 1:41 PM, Richard Niederberg via Stagecraft wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dear Dale,<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">If they built their Hotels like Faraday cages, to strengthen the building from all EMR [Think a real-life version of the fictional 007 'GoldenEye'], they wouldn't have a problem with the FCC.
<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">/s/ Richard<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Dale Farmer via Stagecraft <<a href="mailto:stagecraft@theatrical.net" target="_blank">stagecraft@theatrical.net</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
<br>
The FCC released it's ruling on the marriott wifi blocking matter. WHat they did was essentially jamming, and anyone else who tries to do this will get "...substantial monetary penalties."<br>
<br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/the-fcc-fined-marriott-for-600-000-for-blocking-guests-1642154851/1682126231" target="_blank">http://gizmodo.com/the-fcc-fined-marriott-for-600-000-for-blocking-guests-1642154851/1682126231</a><br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.fcc.gov/document/warning-wi-fi-blocking-prohibited" target="_blank">http://www.fcc.gov/document/warning-wi-fi-blocking-prohibited</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>