<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body>
<div>You go to one and say that the other one has no objection but wanted to check with the first before final approval. </div><div><br></div><div>You can get formal by typing up a memo for record from you to the facility folks that sets out what you are doing, and references to the OSHA standard and a manufacturers statement that thus and such is safe to use. </div><div><br></div><div>Then signature blocks with your signature, then a first endorsement by facility person with approved and disapproved check boxes for them to check and sign. Second endorsement block for health and safety with checkboxes. </div><div><br></div><div>Dale</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div id="composer_signature"><div style="font-size:85%;color:#575757">Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone</div></div><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Stephen Litterst via Stagecraft <stagecraft@theatrical.net> <br>Date: 10/21/2015 16:24 (GMT-05:00) <br>To: Stagecraft <stagecraft@theatrical.net> <br>Cc: Stephen Litterst <litterst.stagecraft@gmail.com> <br>Subject: [SML] Runaround <br><br>I'm trying to get approval to use an atmospheric effect in a facility.<br><br>Facility management says it's up to Health & Safety.<br><br>Health & Safety says it's up to the facility.<br><br>Neither one will give their approval until the other says it's ok first.<br><br><br>-- <br>Stephen Litterst Technical Operations Supervisor<br>litterst@udel.edu Mitchell Hall<br>302/831-0601 University of Delaware<br><br><br>____________________________________________________________<br>For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/><br>Stagecraft mailing list<br>Stagecraft@theatrical.net<br>http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net<br></body></html>