[SML] SML] question for router wizards
info at wjsstudios.com
info at wjsstudios.com
Sat Dec 17 21:27:43 UTC 2016
If I understand your description, it may be an issue changing the base plate size. As the base gets larger your ability to follow detail on the pattern may be lost. I would make a pattern for each shape and use a "pattern follow router bit" or a Flush trim bit. http://www.stewmac.com/Luthier_Tools/Types_of_Tools/Routers_and_Bits/Bits/Ball_Bearing_Router_Bits.html?utm_source=google&utm_medium=shopping&utm_campaign=2016-12-gp&gclid=CKWHpL6V_NACFcS1wAodV3wP-g
Bill Schaffell
WJS Studios
Message: 3
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2016 10:08:48 -0600
From: Bill Conner <billconnerastc at gmail.com>
To: Stagecraft <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
Subject: [SML] question for router wizards
Message-ID:
<CAHtCQ9SOJQ+Sk0_W8icnFRyj=tdo3i9h8Q7b1LO5G1EuoRonLA at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I want to router cut some ply. The shape is composed of several
different ellipses but shouldn't matter. I plan to make a template of
mdf - this is in the range of 4 x 10 feet - and I'd like to cut
"concentric" versions of the shape all within 2-3 inches of the
smallest. I thought I'd make template based on stock router base and
smallest piece, and for larger, make larger round router bases. I
never for a second thought this was a new idea so went googling and
can't find anything on doing this. Lots of different sub bases - but
none that would follow a template on this scale. I could look at two
rollers or pins but seems nothing would be as simple and safe and
accurate as larger round bases.
Probably missing the obvious, but most seem much more expensive for a
one time diy home project.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20161217/31bd1016/attachment.html>
More information about the Stagecraft
mailing list