[SML] Huh.. Interesting

Keith Arsenault iaeg.sml at gmail.com
Wed Jan 6 20:15:48 UTC 2016


yep . .  that was a Marriott    $ 600k fine

http://www.informationweek.com/mobile/mobile-devices/marriott-pays-$600000-for-jamming-wifi-hotspots/d/d-id/1316354


Keith Arsenault
iaeg.sml at gmail.com

813 831 3465  office
813 205 0893  cellular


"The only difference between myself and a madman is that I am not mad"
   Salvador Dali

On Jan 6, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Ford Sellers via Stagecraft <stagecraft at theatrical.net> wrote:

> I believe there was a lawsuit last year against a major hotel chain for jamming outside Wi-fi signals in their convention facilities (via DNS attacks, I think), to force people to purchase and not share their internet service.
> 
> IIRC, the FCC was deeply unamused.
> 
> -Ford
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stagecraft [mailto:stagecraft-bounces at theatrical.net] On Behalf Of Joe D via Stagecraft
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 10:48 AM
> To: Stagecraft Mailing List
> Cc: Joe D
> Subject: Re: [SML] Huh.. Interesting
> 
> Blocking is not the same as transmitting a signal designed to interfere.  Also, in this situation, the user is putting the phone in the case.
> 
> -Joe
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
> Stagecraft mailing list
> Stagecraft at theatrical.net
> http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
> Stagecraft mailing list
> Stagecraft at theatrical.net
> http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net





More information about the Stagecraft mailing list