[SML] Leviton Dimming Racks
Bill Conner
billconnerastc at gmail.com
Tue Jul 26 12:29:48 UTC 2016
I would agree that savings from efficiency of the light source are barely
significant, perhaps house lights and work lights left on for days reducing
electrical energy costs a little. But not having to climb ladders over
fixed seats on tiered floors to replace lamps, that is more efficient.
On Jul 26, 2016 7:21 AM, "Joe D via Stagecraft" <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
wrote:
> Be forewarned that the "energy efficiency" movment has a bit of a
> checkered past. Compact fluorescents, and earlier LEDs sometimes had
> lifespans less than that of a traditional lamp, and but cost 10x the price
> and more. Wind farms are another whole category of failing to live up to
> its promises.
>
> If a technology takes 10 years to pay for itself, it is likely a very bad
> investment. But, if the technology can pay for itself in a year or so, then
> it is a much less risky investment.
>
> -Joe
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
> Stagecraft mailing list
> Stagecraft at theatrical.net
> http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20160726/3a917f09/attachment.html>
More information about the Stagecraft
mailing list