[SML] Big bunches of mics: digital or analog?

[Steven Hood]

We use a mix of ULXD and Axient digital (we had 27 channels in use last 
show), and we love them. For one thing, their transmit bandwidth is way 
narrower than the analog stuff. Also, it's easier to send it into console 
via Dante through the network.

Hth,
Steven R Hood

On March 12, 2024 4:01:28 PM Jon Ares via Stagecraft 
<stagecraft at theatrical.net> wrote:

> Going out to those who use 12-24 wireless mics at a time (a la
> singy-dancy skits) - How do you feel about digital UHF mics? Like
> Shure gear?  We've got a couple of QLX-D handhelds we use for general
> PA stuff, and *I* can't sense any latency, at least for the talking
> heads, and the occasional singer.... but those of you who do lots of
> musicals or such.... have you used a bevy of QLX-D packs? Any latency
> that just makes it a "bad idea?"
>
> If it's a "bad idea," what's a "good idea" that's still available, and
> looks to be available for the next 200 years? (Which will be about the
> time the PTB give me the go-ahead to replace them.)
>
> --
> Jon Ares
> www.arescreative.com
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
> Stagecraft mailing list
> Stagecraft at theatrical.net
> http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20240312/81567905/attachment.html>