[SML] Scaffolding for FOH lighting

Michael Powers mptecdir at gmail.com
Wed Nov 22 21:35:03 UTC 2017


R.M. Wrote:
What about ship rigging w/ sand bags, belaying pins, etc? KISS!
/s/ Richard

Ship rigging i.e. hemp style, is the opposite of KISS.  I grew up with hemp rigging and still love to run shows and watch shows using it IF there are skilled, experienced, trained stagehands using it.  Anything else is dangerous and fool hardy.  Electrics are the most likely to have an accident as they have to be severely out of balance at some point.  The only way to avoid that would be to load/strike one unit at a time, haul the line out balance, bring it back in, repeat for every unit.  


Michael Powers
USMC '65-'69
ETCP Rigger #820 (Ret'd)


> On Nov 22, 2017, at 2:00 PM, stagecraft-request at theatrical.net wrote:
> 
> Send Stagecraft mailing list submissions to
>    stagecraft at theatrical.net
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>    http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>    stagecraft-request at theatrical.net
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>    stagecraft-owner at theatrical.net
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Stagecraft digest..."
> 
> 
> For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re:  Scaffolding for FOH (Richard Niederberg)
>   2. Re:  Scaffolding for FOH (billconnerastc)
>   3. Re:  Scaffolding for FOH (SAMUEL JONES)
>   4. Re:  Scaffolding for FOH (Dave Vick)
>   5. Re:  Scaffolding for FOH (taco at peak.org)
>   6. Re:  Scaffolding for FOH (Mt. Angel Performing Arts Center)
>   7.  Etc Element Help (Brock Keeler)
>   8.  Fire sound snapshots through Midi and Qlab (Brock Keeler)
>   9. Re:  Etc Element Help (Jeffrey E. Salzberg)
>  10. Re:  Etc Element Help (billn at peak.org)
>  11. Re:  FOH hang and focus safety improvement needed (billn at peak.org)
>  12. Re:  FOH hang and focus safety improvement needed (Bill Conner)
>  13. Re:  FOH hang and focus safety improvement needed
>      (Mt. Angel Performing Arts Center)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 12:08:42 -0800
> From: Richard Niederberg <ladesigners at gmail.com>
> To: Stagecraft Mailing List <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Subject: Re: [SML] Scaffolding for FOH
> Message-ID:
>    <CAJSxm-L9_g7L5NOG4gkCFT+s-s=JRWzVnapbK7o8NA12GFJgMg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Dear Bill,
> What about ship rigging w/ sand bags, belaying pins, etc? KISS!
> /s/ Richard
> 
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Bill Nelson via Stagecraft <
> stagecraft at theatrical.net> wrote:
> 
>>> Why can't a short pinrail, inaccessible to the audience, be used, to save
>>> money and promote safety? Even a previously unused ropelock position on
>>> your rail could be utilized.
>>> /s/ Richard
>> 
>> Rail? This theatre doesn't have any fly space. Everything over the stage is
>> dead-hung.
>> 
>> I suppose something could be installed over the audience seating, but then
>> crew would have to be taught how to counterweight battens properly.
>> 
>> Without having permanent stage crew, I do not consider counterweight
>> systems
>> to be safe enough to use.
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> For list information see <http://stagecraft.theprices.net/>
>> Stagecraft mailing list
>> Stagecraft at theatrical.net
>> http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> /s/ Richard
> _________
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20171121/5b950d3a/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 19:39:35 -0600
> From: billconnerastc <billconnerastc at gmail.com>
> To: Stagecraft Mailing List <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Subject: Re: [SML] Scaffolding for FOH
> Message-ID: <5a14d557.c45b240a.ebc03.8bf8 at mx.google.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> I do not recommend rigging electrics on manual counterweight any longer if it can possibly be avoided. It can be done safely but too often is not. It seems the majority of crashes ive seen or heard of are electrics. Strip the electric, bent lock rail. This is 2017. We mostly all have powered sreering and abs brakes. We should expect motorized electrics as just as common.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my Galaxy Tab? S2
> 
> 
> Dear Bill,What about ship rigging w/ sand bags, belaying pins, etc? KISS!/s/ Richard
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20171121/14ecf4d2/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 19:09:48 -0800
> From: SAMUEL JONES <sjones at autoplotvw.com>
> To: Stagecraft Mailing List <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Subject: Re: [SML] Scaffolding for FOH
> Message-ID: <4C51FCDD-F2D7-46FF-9B72-170B21E7EA42 at autoplotvw.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Richard,
> 
> You?re kidding.  Right?  Way more difficult to use.  Training is worse.  I haven?t looked since 2004, but rated equipment like rope clamps is difficult to find.  Not KISS, but KSF (Kill Somebody Fast).
> 
> Sam
> 
>> On Nov 21, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Richard Niederberg via Stagecraft <stagecraft at theatrical.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Bill,
>> What about ship rigging w/ sand bags, belaying pins, etc? KISS!
>> /s/ Richard
>> 
>>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Bill Nelson via Stagecraft <stagecraft at theatrical.net <mailto:stagecraft at theatrical.net>> wrote:
>>> Why can't a short pinrail, inaccessible to the audience, be used, to save
>>> money and promote safety? Even a previously unused ropelock position on
>>> your rail could be utilized.
>>> /s/ Richard
>> 
>> Rail? This theatre doesn't have any fly space. Everything over the stage is
>> dead-hung.
>> 
>> I suppose something could be installed over the audience seating, but then
>> crew would have to be taught how to counterweight battens properly.
>> 
>> Without having permanent stage crew, I do not consider counterweight systems
>> to be safe enough to use.
>> 
>> Bill
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20171121/c33108a4/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 03:32:06 +0000
> From: Dave Vick <dave.vick at gmail.com>
> To: Stagecraft Mailing List <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Subject: Re: [SML] Scaffolding for FOH
> Message-ID:
>    <CAEy8B2kUCyugPnCQNoJ=mpWMUMnJyPyGwLg8AvAyOEDHNhNREQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
>> What about ship rigging w/ sand bags,
>> belaying pins, etc? KISS!
> 
> 
> Ohferfucksake...
> 
> -- 
> Dave Vick
> 517-749-3859
> Sent from my #%!^?? iPhone
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20171122/e0014bc5/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 19:43:18 -0800 (PST)
> From: taco at peak.org
> To: Stagecraft Mailing List <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Subject: Re: [SML] Scaffolding for FOH
> Message-ID:
>    <2067362741.31211595.1511322198845.JavaMail.zimbra at peak.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> In the aisles of the auditorium? I don't think so. 
> 
>> What about ship rigging w/ sand bags, 
>> belaying pins, etc? KISS! 
> 
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20171121/a9386326/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 20:08:07 -0800
> From: "Mt. Angel Performing Arts Center"
>    <admin at mtangelperformingarts.com>
> To: Stagecraft Mailing List <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Subject: Re: [SML] Scaffolding for FOH
> Message-ID:
>    <a80a1d0b-29f9-719a-f69d-0924e0b57acd at mtangelperformingarts.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/21/2017 10:45 AM, Bill Nelson via Stagecraft wrote:
>>> We use a "BilJax" rolling scaffold and IMHO it's worth it's weight in gold.
>>> 
>>> Assembles and disassembles relatively easily, the 6' length spans our
>>> seat-row spacing nicely and can be adjusted somewhat to compensate for a
>>> raked floor.
>>> 
>>> You can set the platform height almost anywhere and you can get
>>> components to make the end supports any height in about 3' increments.
>>> 
>>> Checking their catalog you can get lengths of 6', 8' or 10' so
>>> accommodating most seat spacing should be possible. If not, hiring a
>>> certified welder to re-jigger the braces shouldn't be too expensive
>>> although any manufacturer's warranty would disappear.
>>> 
>>> For OSHA you need outriggers if you go beyond 'platform height x' (which
>>> I do not remember offhand) and the outriggers can be attached and
>>> detached as needed for mobility.
>>> 
>>> I'm sure other manufacturers have similar products but we're happy with
>>> the BilJax.
>>> 
>>> Catalog data starts on page 12 at
>>> <http://www.biljax.com/clientuploads/Catalogs/Scaffold/Catalog_small.pdf>
>>> 
>>> Just my opinion as a satisfied customer.
>>> 
>>> Carla
>> 
>> Thanks Carla.
>> 
>> That looks better than others I have seen previously. My major concern is the
>> weight.
>> 
>> The biggest problem that we may not be able to solve, and it applies to any
>> scaffolding/man-lift system, is "Where do we store it when not in use?". We
>> just do not have the vacant floor space. The only way we could generate enough
>> room would be to remove the couches in the Green Room - and I don't see that
>> being approved.
>> 
>> Bill
> 
> If storage space is an issue it breaks down into flat pieces and can be 
> stored leaning against or bungee'd to a wall.
> 
> Our 12 foot tall one stores in about 3 square feet of space.
> 
> The trade-off is that you then have to re-assemble it each time you use it.
> 
> Carla
> 
> A useful phrase for declining an unwanted advance: I'd love to but I'm 
> afraid that my girlfriend will go to my wife and say to her "Honey, your 
> husband is cheatin' on us."
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 21:12:43 -0800
> From: Brock Keeler <goaliemonkey00 at gmail.com>
> To: stagecraft at theatrical.net
> Subject: [SML] Etc Element Help
> Message-ID: <7F67CCEF-9CEF-4B64-B698-8417239792D6 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> 
> Hi Guys,
> 
> My theatres console is and Etc element, and I recently updated the software to the latest version and once it finished downloading, I reloaded my show file and none of my lights appear to be functioning, the patching all seems to be correct and I can?t find anything wrong so i was wondering if any of you have had the same issue or a solution to my problem
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 8
> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 21:15:02 -0800
> From: Brock Keeler <goaliemonkey00 at gmail.com>
> To: stagecraft at theatrical.net
> Subject: [SML] Fire sound snapshots through Midi and Qlab
> Message-ID: <A87B7200-95FE-4C3B-A83C-559FD441257A at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I run all my shows through Qlab, and use a Midi to USB cable to control my lighting console via Midi Show control and Qlab. We are running a Digico SD11 sound console and I know there is a way to fire sound snapshots through lab via Midi but I have not been able to figure it out. If any of you have done this and could help me with some step by step instructions that would be great
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 9
> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 02:02:49 -0800 (PST)
> From: "Jeffrey E. Salzberg" <jeff at jeffsalzberg.com>
> To: stagecraft <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Subject: Re: [SML] Etc Element Help
> Message-ID:
>    <751773204.224232.1511344969036.JavaMail.zimbra at jeffsalzberg.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Call tech support at 800-688-4116. If it's after hours, leave a message; they'll call you back within 15 minutes. 
> 
> 
> Hi Guys, 
> 
> My theatres console is and Etc element, and I recently updated the software to the latest version and once it finished downloading, I reloaded my show file and none of my lights appear to be functioning, the patching all seems to be correct and I can?t find anything wrong so i was wondering if any of you have had the same issue or a solution to my problem 
> 
> Thanks! 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20171122/893b1b61/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 10
> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 04:21:37 -0800 (PST)
> From: billn at peak.org
> To: "Stagecraft Mailing List" <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Subject: Re: [SML] Etc Element Help
> Message-ID:
>    <d84d68554cd0d5f6a18c8949ba14ea27.squirrel at webmail.peak.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> 
>> My theatres console is and Etc element, and I recently updated the software to
>> the latest version and once it finished downloading, I reloaded my show file
>> and none of my lights appear to be functioning, the patching all seems to be
>> correct and I can???t find anything wrong so i was wondering if any of you
>> have had the same issue or a solution to my problem
> 
> Do any of your lights have a DMX signal present indicator? If so, does the
> indicator appear to be flashing normally?
> 
> Are you using the two DMX ports on the back of the console or are you using
> networking?
> 
> If using the two DMX ports:
> 
> Exit into 'Settings' and check that Local DMX is enabled, DMX is the default
> and that the two universes are configured correctly.
> 
> If that does not fix the problem and you system configuration appears correct,
> call ETC for tech support.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 05:01:36 -0800 (PST)
> From: billn at peak.org
> To: "Stagecraft Mailing List" <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Subject: Re: [SML] FOH hang and focus safety improvement needed
> Message-ID:
>    <8871cdb3cce80a61f87d2b3b964542e3.squirrel at webmail.peak.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> I just made some measurements in the auditorium.
> 
> With a foot height of 11 feet, my head would be level with the highest light
> bar. I am about 5 ft 9 inches tall.
> 
> I would like to go higher, but the light bars are less than 1 foot below the
> ceiling.
> 
> The seat row spacing is 31" plus/minus about 1 inch.
> 
> The aisle widths are 3' 1" HR and 3' 6" HL.
> 
> The only cross aisle is the one between the front row of seats and the stage
> apron. It is at least 4 foot wide, but I don't know if an assembled scaffold
> could be maneuvered around the corner seats into the side aisles for use.
> 
> Bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 12
> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 06:32:34 -0800
> From: Bill Conner <billconnerastc at gmail.com>
> To: Stagecraft <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Subject: Re: [SML] FOH hang and focus safety improvement needed
> Message-ID:
>    <CAHtCQ9SPvuHj6FHedpr5H2WiSB9TcukuD4zd6DpJjU8VSyTHng at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Just for an off beat approach, aluminum truss catwalk that spans the room,
> a rail on each side wall, and store catwalk against rear wall when not in
> use. Now you can get to whole ceiling, as many battens as you wish, house
> lights and all.
> 
> No doubt some director would use it in a show some day.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20171122/3828b3df/attachment-0001.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 13
> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 08:03:50 -0800
> From: "Mt. Angel Performing Arts Center"
>    <admin at mtangelperformingarts.com>
> To: Stagecraft Mailing List <stagecraft at theatrical.net>
> Subject: Re: [SML] FOH hang and focus safety improvement needed
> Message-ID:
>    <c2508b4a-fe6a-cc4d-772c-68f63cad6625 at mtangelperformingarts.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> 
> 
>> On 11/22/2017 5:01 AM, Bill Nelson via Stagecraft wrote:
>> I just made some measurements in the auditorium.
>> 
>> With a foot height of 11 feet, my head would be level with the highest light
>> bar. I am about 5 ft 9 inches tall.
>> 
>> I would like to go higher, but the light bars are less than 1 foot below the
>> ceiling.
>> 
>> The seat row spacing is 31" plus/minus about 1 inch.
>> 
>> The aisle widths are 3' 1" HR and 3' 6" HL.
>> 
>> The only cross aisle is the one between the front row of seats and the stage
>> apron. It is at least 4 foot wide, but I don't know if an assembled scaffold
>> could be maneuvered around the corner seats into the side aisles for use.
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
> 
> The BilJax base units are 29" wide so they should fit into your aisle 
> space. You can clamp on the outriggers once positioned in the seating area.
> 
> These are 'stock in trade' for most local rental yards so maybe rent one 
> for a half-day and see if it will negotiate your terrain. I think that 
> would be easier and more productive than a tabletop simulation.
> 
> Also keep in mind you can put the cross braces at any height so it will 
> span over the tops of your seats.
> 
> I didn't find the scaffold dimensions anywhere on the previously 
> referenced page but they are here: 
> <http://www.biljax.com/clientuploads/Catalogs/Scaffold/Pro-JaxCat.pdf>
> 
> Carla
> 
> Exclaimed the falling man as he plunged past the 24th story, ?So far, so 
> good!?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Stagecraft mailing list
> Stagecraft at theatrical.net
> http://theatrical.net/mailman/listinfo/stagecraft_theatrical.net
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Stagecraft Digest, Vol 39, Issue 20
> ******************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://theatrical.net/pipermail/stagecraft_theatrical.net/attachments/20171122/a491f534/attachment.html>


More information about the Stagecraft mailing list